Rebuttal of Opposing Economist Reports
Structured critique of opposing assumptions, data, and methods under Daubert and damages law—with alternative calculations where appropriate.
When Opposing Counsel Has Retained an Economist
Opposing economist reports often drive settlement ranges and trial strategy. A structured rebuttal identifies methodological flaws, unsupported assumptions, data errors, and misapplication of damages law—while offering alternative quantification where the record supports it.
Rebuttal engagements are common on both plaintiff and defense sides and may include Daubert motion support, deposition outline preparation, and trial cross-examination themes.
Common Targets of Rebuttal
- Inflated growth rates or occupational earnings not supported by BLS/OEWS data
- Failure to credit mitigation, interim earnings, or collateral sources per instruction
- Incorrect work-life expectancy or failure to address reduced life expectancy
- Double counting with life care plans, household services, or other experts
- Present value errors including wrong discount rate or nominal/real confusion
- Capacity vs. earnings measure mismatch with jurisdiction and pleadings
Deliverables
Rebuttal reports range from focused assumption critiques to full alternative damages models. Scope is defined with counsel based on budget, timeline, and whether testimony will be required.
Methodology
| Phase | What We Do | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Report deconstruction | Line-by-line review of opposing report. Map every assumption to underlying data or identify unsupported assertions. | Assumption inventory with issue flags |
| Data verification | Verify BLS/OEWS citations, tax data usage, and arithmetic. Identify calculation errors. | Verification memo with corrected figures where applicable |
| Alternative analysis | Where scoped, run alternative model using defensible assumptions aligned with your theory. | Alternative damages schedule or range |
| Rebuttal report & trial support | Draft rebuttal expert report. Prepare cross-examination outline and testimony if retained. | Rebuttal report and deposition/trial support materials |
Frequently Asked Questions
- When should rebuttal retention occur?
- As soon as the opposing economist report is disclosed—ideally before taking the opposing expert's deposition. Rush rebuttals are available when discovery deadlines are tight.
- What do rebuttal experts typically challenge?
- Unsupported earnings growth, wrong occupational classifications, work-life inconsistencies, fringe benefit double counting, present value errors, failure to mitigate, and speculative projections for minors or students.
- Can rebuttal be combined with affirmative damages?
- Yes. Many retentions include parallel affirmative analysis with defensible assumptions plus line-by-line critique of the opposing report.
Related earnings damages type → · How earnings are calculated →
Quantify your economic damages — contact us today.
Connect with a qualified forensic economist for future earnings, earning capacity, and expert witness support.
Contact Us